On May 5th the state of Karnataka held elections
to vote in a new state government. It was quite a significant affair with many
street closures in the month long run up to election day to allow political
rallies. Posters, and political slogans daubed on walls sprang up everywhere. Cars with loud speakers patrolled residential areas exhorting people to vote and at least one bomb exploded in Bangalore. Even worse, for three days around the vote sales of
alcohol were banned across the state!
In the event, as widely tipped, the ruling BJP party was
kicked out of office and Congress, the traditional ruling party in this part of
India, resumed power.
Participation in Indian politics is relatively high in
international terms. Turnout in the
World’s Biggest Democracy is usually around 60% and is generally higher for
state elections than for the distant national Parliament. Tip O’Neill coined the phrase that ‘all
politics is local’. Well that is never
truer anywhere than it is in India.
People here vote with the expectation that the winning party will make
good promises on delivering local infrastructure projects: roads, schools and
water supply.
I met several people who were passionately involved and very
partisan. The irony is that so few of
the people I mix with socially seemed to care.
It was easy to get drivers or waiters to discuss the forthcoming
election, but the professional classes and the urban middle class genuinely
seemed to have little interest or involvement.
The reason is that the rich in this country largely opt out
of politics. They pay for private
education and medical care, employ private security firms to police their gated
compounds, and remain largely indifferent to corruption and inefficiency in
state offices. Consequently they see no
reason to pay tax. India has a shockingly low tax base. In December, India’s finance minister,
Palaniappan Chidambaram, announced that only about 36 million people filed
income taxes last year. That’s 2.89 percent of the population. If it means that
they have to drive their SUVs on rutted roads past piles of accumulated garbage
and emaciated people dressed in rags sleeping on the verge, well so be it.
I do not profess any faith or religious beliefs. But I think it is not a coincidence that Christianity
teaches charity and responsibility for ones fellow man, and European politics pretty
much across the continent boils down to various flavours of social
democracy. In the USA, where there is a
tradition of philanthropic giving, they do it differently. Hinduism by contrast is essentially
fatalistic and focuses on personal behaviour and the self. To my mind that attitude permeates much of
Indian society and culture.
So what has any of this got to do with food or
sustainability? Those are after all the
purported subjects of this blog. Well
yesterday, tucked away on the inside pages of the Times of India, I read a
small article that said that the new Karnataka government was about to effect a
change in policy to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the state’s retail
sector. This is yet another step in the
long march towards economic liberalisation begun in 1991. However, many small producers and traders are
deeply unhappy about the prospect of Karnataka’s retail industry being opened
to foreign competition.
In the west the arguments for liberal economics are so
dominant it seems strange to think that this could be such a contentious issue
here. So complete is our belief in free
trade, deregulation, competition and the power of market forces that we forget
that alternatives do exist. Since the
reforms were introduced foreign inwards investment in India has
skyrocketed. Annual GDP growth has accelerated
from just 1¼ % in the three decades after Independence to today’s 7½ %. The city where I am living, Bangalore, has
become a global IT hub, and India sits proudly as a BRIC nation second only to
China in the pace of economic development.
Yet, as elsewhere in the world, the fruits of economic development have
not been shared equitably. Rising
prosperity has been accompanied by a massive growth in inequality. There is a record number of super rich
Indians but the lowest tiers of Indian society have been left behind. The reforms have brought virtually no change
in incomes or average consumption for people at the bottom of the pile. Economic growth has not been translated into
employment growth or a significant change in educational standards for the
masses. Basic nutrition remains a
fundamental concern for millions of the poor.
I enjoy food shopping in Bangalore. There are several small independent
supermarkets where, by shopping around, I can buy pretty much everything I
need. They are not stylish and choice is
limited. The expat telegraph buzzes with news that such and such a place has
got a delivery of French Brie or Danish butter.
But most things are available if you know where to look. Certainly it’s a lot better than China in
that regard.
It is also quite chastening to take a stroll in to the local
village, Nagenahalli, and see how the locals live. I frequently visit a local green grocer. At first, the presence of a white face caused
some consternation, but now they are used to me. For my part I have got over my fixation with
perfectly formed vegetables and uniform, smooth skinned fruit. Here you get produce just as nature creates
it, in all shapes and sizes and with blemishes.
It doesn’t alter the taste one jot! Potatoes, garlic, onions, chilies, capsicums,
bitter gourd and okra are always available.
Cauliflowers, courgettes, aubergines, tomatoes, carrots and string beans
are usually to be had. After that? Well
don’t hold your breath. It’s not that
other things aren’t available, but they come and go as they should.
Agricultural produce is locally grown and available when in
season. The mango season has just ended,
but when they were available they were amazing.
Potentially FDI means that this time next year Nagenahalli
could have a Wal-Mart, a Carrefour or a Tesco Express. I will be able to push my trolley around in
luxurious airconditioned aisles groaning with wondrous, foreign imported foods. Perhaps this village will disappear under
piles of superfluous packaging, local farmers will be driven out of business
and my village shop will be demolished to make way for a hundred car parking
lot. Perhaps that’s progress. No doubt there would be a tiny uptick in
India’s GDP associated with the retail revolution in Nagenahalli.
Is it patronising and hypocritical of me to want to deny the
pleasures of the first world to people here.
Why should they be denied the right to buy South African apples or Dutch
lettuces? And can anyone really hold
back the tide of development anyway?
But here’s another irony.
The people who would benefit from a retail revolution are the same
middle classes who eschewed the elections.
The poor people of Nagenahalli don’t want to buy taramasalata or
Californian wines. They don’t need
loyalty cards or two-for-one offers on shampoo.
Most toiletries are sold here in single use sachets. I bet, if anybody were to ask them, they just
want jobs, a community and somewhere to sell their meager farm produce. Now that would be worth voting for!